# Pachuca

Pachuca, un real. Third period, consignment 210-1864. Sub-consignment 1 (1865) to Mineral del Chico With Mineral del Monte cancel??? |
Pachuca, un real. Third period, consignment 210-1864. Sub-consignment 1 (1865) to Mineral del Chico With Mineral del Monte cancel??? |
Pachuca, un real. Third period, consignment 210-1864. Sub-consignment 1 (1865) to Mineral del Chico With Pachuca cancel. |
Pachuca, un real. Third period, consignment 235-1864. |
Pachuca, un real. Third period, consignment 235-1864. Sub-consignment 4 (1865) to Mineral del Monte |

It would appear from the above two examples that Mineral del Monte also received stamps of sub-consignment 1 (1865), though Corbett mentions only Atotonilco, Omitlan and Mineral del Chico. Corbett's estimate of only 50 1R stamps sent in this sub-consignment would therefore appear to be a little low.

The Pachuca cancel is often found on even these small sub-consignments.

Also note that the first three stamps shown clearly came from two different printings.

Year | Month | Day | Invoice | ½R | 1R | 2R | 4R | 8R | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

1864 | 11 | 9 | 210 | 0 | 2000 | 3000 | 0 | 0 | At least two printings of the 1R. Known with error 201 once in every sheet. |

1864 | 12 | 21 | 235 | 0 | 2500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |

Total sent | 2 | 0 | 4500 | 3000 | 0 | 0 |